Background of the Study
Farmer group lending models have emerged as effective mechanisms for extending credit to rural agricultural communities, particularly for smallholder farmers who often lack sufficient collateral individually. United Bank for Africa (UBA) has implemented group lending schemes that leverage social collateral, where a group of farmers jointly guarantees each other’s loans (Nwankwo, 2023). This model reduces the perceived credit risk for the bank and increases access to finance by pooling the collective financial strength of the group. Group lending also fosters a sense of community accountability and encourages members to support each other in ensuring timely repayments.
UBA’s group lending strategy is supported by targeted financial literacy programs and capacity-building initiatives that educate farmers on proper financial management and agricultural best practices (Ogunleye, 2024). Digital tools, such as mobile applications, facilitate efficient communication and monitoring of group performance, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of the lending model (Ibrahim, 2025). This model not only improves loan uptake and repayment rates but also contributes to broader rural development by empowering farmers to collaborate and share risks.
Nevertheless, challenges exist in scaling and standardizing group lending models. Variability in group cohesion, differences in local market conditions, and the potential for free-riding behavior can affect repayment performance. Additionally, regulatory and operational challenges may hinder the uniform application of group lending practices across different regions. This study evaluates the impact of farmer group lending models on rural agricultural financing at UBA, with a focus on loan performance, group dynamics, and risk mitigation, and aims to provide recommendations for enhancing the model’s effectiveness.
Statement of the Problem
Although group lending models have been successful in extending credit to rural farmers, significant challenges remain. A primary problem is the variability in group dynamics, which can lead to inconsistent repayment performance (Chinwe, 2023). In some cases, weak group cohesion and inadequate collective responsibility may result in free-riding, where certain members default without repercussions, thereby increasing credit risk for the group. Furthermore, the lack of standardized monitoring mechanisms and varying levels of financial literacy among group members can compromise the effectiveness of these lending models (Ogunleye, 2024).
Additionally, external factors such as fluctuating commodity prices and regional economic disparities further exacerbate repayment challenges. The inconsistent application of regulatory guidelines across regions also poses operational difficulties in managing group loans effectively. These challenges limit the potential of group lending to achieve sustainable credit expansion and improved agricultural productivity. This study seeks to investigate these issues by evaluating the effectiveness of farmer group lending models at UBA, with a focus on understanding the factors that drive group performance and identifying strategies to mitigate associated risks.
Objectives of the Study
• To assess the effectiveness of farmer group lending models in enhancing credit access.
• To identify key challenges affecting group cohesion and repayment performance.
• To recommend strategies for improving the reliability and scalability of group lending.
Research Questions
• How effective are group lending models in improving agricultural credit access?
• What factors hinder the effective functioning of group lending schemes?
• What measures can strengthen group dynamics and reduce default rates?
Research Hypotheses
• H1: Strong group cohesion significantly improves repayment performance.
• H2: Targeted financial literacy programs enhance the effectiveness of group lending.
• H3: Standardized monitoring and regulatory frameworks reduce default rates in group lending.
Scope and Limitations of the Study
This study focuses on UBA’s farmer group lending models in rural agricultural areas from 2023 to 2025. Limitations include regional differences in group formation and variability in socio-economic conditions.
Definitions of Terms
• Group Lending Models: Credit schemes where a group of borrowers jointly guarantees loan repayment.
• Social Collateral: The collective assurance provided by a group as an alternative to traditional collateral.
• Credit Access: The ease with which borrowers can obtain financial services.
ABSTRACT
Some of the major problems facing SMEs today include environmental factors. Performance of Small and Medium Sca...
ABSTRACT
This study was undertaken among other reasons of leadership style on the employee's performance in organiza...
Background of the Study
Community-based nutrition interventions are pivotal in improving maternal health o...
Background of the Study
Health librarians require advanced information literacy skills to support evidence‐based practice,...
Background of the Study
Small-scale businesses are the backbone of many economies, particularly in developing countries like Nigeria, whe...
Background of the Study
Market fluctuations significantly influence the dynamics of agricultural lending,...
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out on the availability and utilization of electronic resources by...
Background of the Study
University budget allocation is a complex process that significantly influences the overall academ...
Background of the Study
International Auditing Standards (IAS) are crucial for ensuring transparency, accuracy, and acco...
Background of the Study
Financial education is a key driver of customer behavior, particularly in the realm of Islamic ban...